Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs ICBMX
FRNRX vs ICBMX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs ICBMX
FRNRX vs ICBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. ICBMX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and ICBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 492M vs. ICBMX (134M). FRNRX pays higher dividends than ICBMX: FRNRX (1.47) vs ICBMX (1.29). FRNRX was incepted earlier than ICBMX: FRNRX (31 years) vs ICBMX (29 years). ICBMX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). ICBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 154.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX (1000) and ICBMX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.84 vs. ICBMX (21.38). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 127.04 vs. ICBMX (37.01).
| FRNRX | ICBMX | FRNRX / ICBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.31 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.31 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.808 | 19.248 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 492M | 134M | 367% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.29 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.84 | 21.38 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.72 | 23.51 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 127.04 | 37.01 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.50 | 88.00 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement