Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs MCGRX
FRNRX vs MCGRX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs MCGRX
FRNRX vs MCGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. MCGRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and MCGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 555M vs. MCGRX (203M). MCGRX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: MCGRX (1.93) vs FRNRX (1.30). FRNRX was incepted earlier than MCGRX: FRNRX (31 years) vs MCGRX (32 years). MCGRX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (0.97). MCGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FRNRX (27.09). FRNRX (1000) and MCGRX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.16 vs. MCGRX (12.97). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 157.66 vs. MCGRX (20.94).
| FRNRX | MCGRX | FRNRX / MCGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.89 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.89 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.483 | 9.146 | 322% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 203M | 273% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.93 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.16 | 12.97 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.82 | 13.42 | 483% |
| Returns for 5 years | 157.66 | 20.94 | 753% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.74 | -25.80 | -429% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement