Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs MDGRX
FRNRX vs MDGRX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs MDGRX
FRNRX vs MDGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. MDGRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and MDGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 510M vs. MDGRX (197M). MDGRX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: MDGRX (1.66) vs FRNRX (1.38). FRNRX was incepted earlier than MDGRX: FRNRX (31 years) vs MDGRX (32 years). MDGRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). MDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX (6%) and MDGRX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRNRX (1000) and MDGRX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.28 vs. MDGRX (19.40). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 113.13 vs. MDGRX (32.88).
| FRNRX | MDGRX | FRNRX / MDGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.16 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.16 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.697 | 9.013 | 207% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 197M | 259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.66 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.28 | 19.40 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.68 | 28.69 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.13 | 32.88 | 344% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.98 | 5.36 | 1,791% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement