Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs MDGRX
FRNRX vs MDGRX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs MDGRX
FRNRX vs MDGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. MDGRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and MDGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 555M vs. MDGRX (206M). FRNRX (1.42) and MDGRX (1.42) have matching dividends . FRNRX was incepted earlier than MDGRX: FRNRX (31 years) vs MDGRX (32 years). MDGRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). MDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX (6%) and MDGRX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRNRX (1000) and MDGRX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.14 vs. MDGRX (31.26). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 174.73 vs. MDGRX (57.31).
| FRNRX | MDGRX | FRNRX / MDGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.16 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.16 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.426 | 17.369 | 181% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 206M | 269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.42 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.14 | 31.26 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.22 | 36.68 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 174.73 | 57.31 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.19 | 7.30 | 1,428% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers