Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs MDGRX
FRNRX vs MDGRX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs MDGRX
FRNRX vs MDGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. MDGRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and MDGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 555M vs. MDGRX (203M). MDGRX (1.31) and FRNRX (1.30) have matching dividends . FRNRX was incepted earlier than MDGRX: FRNRX (31 years) vs MDGRX (32 years). MDGRX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (0.97). MDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FRNRX (27.09). FRNRX (6%) and MDGRX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRNRX (1000) and MDGRX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.16 vs. MDGRX (22.84). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 157.66 vs. MDGRX (50.21).
| FRNRX | MDGRX | FRNRX / MDGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.17 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.17 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.483 | 16.413 | 180% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 203M | 273% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.31 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.16 | 22.84 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.82 | 31.33 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 157.66 | 50.21 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.74 | 11.07 | 1,000% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement