Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs RGNCX
FRNRX vs RGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs RGNCX
FRNRX vs RGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. RGNCX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and RGNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNCX has more cash in the bank: 612M vs. FRNRX (506M). RGNCX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: RGNCX (3.44) vs FRNRX (1.47). FRNRX was incepted earlier than RGNCX: FRNRX (31 years) vs RGNCX (19 years). RGNCX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). RGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNCX: FRNRX (1000) vs RGNCX (2500). RGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 65.75 vs. FRNRX (41.08). RGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 265.27 vs. FRNRX (139.33).
| FRNRX | RGNCX | FRNRX / RGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.28 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.99 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.695 | 29.215 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 612M | 83% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 3.44 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.08 | 65.75 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.13 | 108.21 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 139.33 | 265.27 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.95 | 204.70 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement