Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs RGNCX
FRNRX vs RGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs RGNCX
FRNRX vs RGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. RGNCX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Buy and RGNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNCX has more cash in the bank: 642M vs. FRNRX (527M). RGNCX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: RGNCX (3.52) vs FRNRX (1.42). FRNRX was incepted earlier than RGNCX: FRNRX (31 years) vs RGNCX (19 years). RGNCX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). RGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNCX: FRNRX (1000) vs RGNCX (2500). RGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 79.00 vs. FRNRX (48.04). RGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 288.10 vs. FRNRX (144.11).
| FRNRX | RGNCX | FRNRX / RGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.28 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.99 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.650 | 36.794 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 527M | 642M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 3.52 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.04 | 79.00 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.01 | 115.82 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.11 | 288.10 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.77 | 215.75 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers