Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs RGNCX
FRNRX vs RGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs RGNCX
FRNRX vs RGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. RGNCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and RGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNCX has more cash in the bank: 633M vs. FRNRX (510M). RGNCX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: RGNCX (3.28) vs FRNRX (1.38). FRNRX was incepted earlier than RGNCX: FRNRX (31 years) vs RGNCX (19 years). RGNCX (2.99) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). RGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNCX: FRNRX (1000) vs RGNCX (2500). RGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 91.73 vs. FRNRX (44.28). RGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 248.62 vs. FRNRX (113.13).
| FRNRX | RGNCX | FRNRX / RGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.28 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.99 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.697 | 33.578 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 633M | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 3.28 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.28 | 91.73 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.68 | 132.22 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.13 | 248.62 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.98 | 220.30 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement