Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs RSNRX
FRNRX vs RSNRX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs RSNRX
FRNRX vs RSNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. RSNRX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and RSNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSNRX has more cash in the bank: 635M vs. FRNRX (555M). RSNRX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: RSNRX (3.24) vs FRNRX (1.30). FRNRX was incepted earlier than RSNRX: FRNRX (31 years) vs RSNRX (31 years). RSNRX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (0.97). RSNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FRNRX (27.09). RSNRX (6%) and FRNRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSNRX: FRNRX (1000) vs RSNRX (2500). RSNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.58 vs. FRNRX (41.80). RSNRX return over 5 years is better than : 251.70 vs. FRNRX (151.81).
| FRNRX | RSNRX | FRNRX / RSNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.48 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.51 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.141 | 30.052 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 635M | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 3.24 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.80 | 56.58 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.79 | 115.64 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.81 | 251.70 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.79 | 235.97 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement