Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs RSNRX
FRNRX vs RSNRX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs RSNRX
FRNRX vs RSNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. RSNRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and RSNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSNRX has more cash in the bank: 633M vs. FRNRX (510M). RSNRX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: RSNRX (3.19) vs FRNRX (1.38). FRNRX was incepted earlier than RSNRX: FRNRX (31 years) vs RSNRX (31 years). RSNRX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). RSNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). RSNRX (6%) and FRNRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSNRX: FRNRX (1000) vs RSNRX (2500). RSNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 93.48 vs. FRNRX (42.35). RSNRX return over 5 years is better than : 263.59 vs. FRNRX (113.80).
| FRNRX | RSNRX | FRNRX / RSNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.48 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.51 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.985 | 33.653 | 53% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 633M | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 3.19 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.35 | 93.48 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.65 | 137.14 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.80 | 263.59 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.80 | 245.76 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement