Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs RSNRX
FRNRX vs RSNRX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs RSNRX
FRNRX vs RSNRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. RSNRX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Buy and RSNRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSNRX has more cash in the bank: 642M vs. FRNRX (527M). RSNRX pays higher dividends than FRNRX: RSNRX (3.41) vs FRNRX (1.42). FRNRX was incepted earlier than RSNRX: FRNRX (31 years) vs RSNRX (31 years). RSNRX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). RSNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). RSNRX (6%) and FRNRX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSNRX: FRNRX (1000) vs RSNRX (2500). RSNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 77.90 vs. FRNRX (46.81). RSNRX return over 5 years is better than : 299.86 vs. FRNRX (143.84).
| FRNRX | RSNRX | FRNRX / RSNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.48 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.51 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.513 | 36.054 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 96% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 527M | 642M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 3.41 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.81 | 77.90 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.19 | 120.62 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 143.84 | 299.86 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.76 | 233.87 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement