Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRNRX vs RYBCX
FRNRX vs RYBCX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs RYBCX
FRNRX vs RYBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. RYBCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Hold and RYBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 500M vs. RYBCX (35.9M). FRNRX pays higher dividends than RYBCX: FRNRX (1.42) vs RYBCX (0.80). FRNRX was incepted earlier than RYBCX: FRNRX (31 years) vs RYBCX (25 years). RYBCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.01). RYBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. FRNRX (19.72). FRNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBCX: FRNRX (1000) vs RYBCX (2500). FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.69 vs. RYBCX (12.37). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 131.46 vs. RYBCX (3.26).
| FRNRX | RYBCX | FRNRX / RYBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.38 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.43 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.080 | 3.854 | 495% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 500M | 35.9M | 1,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.80 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.69 | 12.37 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.69 | 4.61 | 1,165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 131.46 | 3.26 | 4,028% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.93 | 60.94 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement