FRO
Price
$17.13
Change
+$0.37 (+2.21%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.33B
26 days until earnings call
LPG
Price
$22.01
Change
+$0.59 (+2.75%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.66B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRO vs LPG

Header iconFRO vs LPG Comparison
Open Charts FRO vs LPGBanner chart's image
Frontline
Price$17.13
Change+$0.37 (+2.21%)
Volume$2.26M
Capitalization5.33B
DORIAN LPG
Price$22.01
Change+$0.59 (+2.75%)
Volume$543.72K
Capitalization1.66B
FRO vs LPG Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRO vs. LPG commentary
May 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRO is a StrongBuy and LPG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FRO: $17.13 vs. LPG: $22.01)
Brand notoriety: FRO and LPG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRO: 72% vs. LPG: 64%
Market capitalization -- FRO: $5.33B vs. LPG: $1.66B
FRO [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $5.33B. LPG’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLPG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRO is a better buy in the long-term than LPG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPG’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LPG’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LPG is a better buy in the short-term than FRO.

Price Growth

FRO (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +3.44% price change this week, while LPG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 29, 2025.

LPG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.20% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRO($5.33B) has a higher market cap than LPG($1.66B). FRO has higher P/E ratio than LPG: FRO (6.80) vs LPG (5.42). FRO YTD gains are higher at: 22.284 vs. LPG (-7.081). FRO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 938M vs. LPG (428M). LPG has less debt than FRO: LPG (818M) vs FRO (2.26B). FRO has higher revenues than LPG: FRO (1.92B) vs LPG (553M).
FROLPGFRO / LPG
Capitalization5.33B1.66B321%
EBITDA938M428M219%
Gain YTD22.284-7.081-315%
P/E Ratio6.805.42125%
Revenue1.92B553M347%
Total CashN/A208M-
Total Debt2.26B818M276%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRO vs LPG: Fundamental Ratings
FRO
LPG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3530
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4454
SMR RATING
1..100
4054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6150
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LPG's Valuation (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FRO (11). This means that LPG’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as LPG (54). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to LPG’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's SMR Rating (40) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as LPG (54). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to LPG’s over the last 12 months.

FRO's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as LPG (62). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to LPG’s over the last 12 months.

LPG's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FRO (61). This means that LPG’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FROLPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USSG51.580.98
+1.94%
Xtrackers MSCI USA Selection Eq ETF
PHYD50.980.16
+0.32%
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF
FGB3.87N/A
N/A
First Trust Specialty Finance and Financial Opportunities Fund
IGLB48.69-0.14
-0.29%
iShares 10+ Year Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
FXP12.19-0.80
-6.16%
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50

FRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRO has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRO jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRO
1D Price
Change %
FRO100%
+2.21%
DHT - FRO
88%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
TNK - FRO
82%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
INSW - FRO
80%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
STNG - FRO
79%
Closely correlated
+3.68%
TK - FRO
74%
Closely correlated
+2.98%
More