FROG
Price
$49.37
Change
-$0.70 (-1.40%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
5.76B
60 days until earnings call
GTLB
Price
$48.02
Change
-$1.01 (-2.06%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.93B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FROG vs GTLB

Header iconFROG vs GTLB Comparison
Open Charts FROG vs GTLBBanner chart's image
JFrog
Price$49.37
Change-$0.70 (-1.40%)
Volume$842.27K
Capitalization5.76B
GitLab
Price$48.02
Change-$1.01 (-2.06%)
Volume$4.99M
Capitalization7.93B
FROG vs GTLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FROG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FROG vs. GTLB commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FROG is a Buy and GTLB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (FROG: $49.37 vs. GTLB: $48.02)
Brand notoriety: FROG and GTLB are both not notable
FROG represents the Packaged Software, while GTLB is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FROG: 66% vs. GTLB: 117%
Market capitalization -- FROG: $5.76B vs. GTLB: $7.93B
FROG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.76B. GTLB’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $7.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FROG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FROG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FROG and GTLB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FROG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTLB’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FROG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GTLB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLB is a better buy in the short-term than FROG.

Price Growth

FROG (@Packaged Software) experienced а +4.95% price change this week, while GTLB (@Computer Communications) price change was +6.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.70%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

FROG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.62% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.17% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTLB($7.93B) has a higher market cap than FROG($5.76B). FROG YTD gains are higher at: 67.868 vs. GTLB (-14.783). FROG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -76.94M vs. GTLB (-112.15M). GTLB has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. FROG (612M). GTLB has less debt than FROG: GTLB (392K) vs FROG (13.8M). GTLB has higher revenues than FROG: GTLB (805M) vs FROG (475M).
FROGGTLBFROG / GTLB
Capitalization5.76B7.93B73%
EBITDA-76.94M-112.15M69%
Gain YTD67.868-14.783-459%
P/E RatioN/A533.56-
Revenue475M805M59%
Total Cash612M1.11B55%
Total Debt13.8M392K3,520%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FROGGTLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FROG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHRRX21.65N/A
N/A
Invesco Charter R
FACSX53.53N/A
N/A
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Opportunities C
GSMCX39.26N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
ICMVX13.68N/A
N/A
Intrepid Capital Institutional
RNWGX91.06-0.33
-0.36%
American Funds New World R6

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
-2.05%
PATH - GTLB
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
HUBS - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
TEAM - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
COIN - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
FRSH - GTLB
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More