FROG
Price
$78.71
Change
-$1.18 (-1.48%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
9.53B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GTLB
Price
$27.00
Change
+$1.17 (+4.53%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.56B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FROG vs GTLB

FROG vs GTLB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FROG vs. GTLB commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FROG is a Hold and GTLB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FROG: $78.71 vs. GTLB: $27.00)
Brand notoriety: FROG and GTLB are both not notable
FROG represents the Packaged Software, while GTLB is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FROG: 72% vs. GTLB: 72%
Market capitalization -- FROG: $9.53B vs. GTLB: $4.56B
FROG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $9.53B. GTLB’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $4.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.78T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $28.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FROG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FROG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FROG is a better buy in the long-term than GTLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FROG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTLB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FROG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GTLB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FROG is a better buy in the short-term than GTLB.

Price Growth

FROG (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while GTLB (@Computer Communications) price change was -2.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

FROG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

GTLB is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-3.44% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (-2.46% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FROG($9.53B) has a higher market cap than GTLB($4.56B). FROG YTD gains are higher at: 26.017 vs. GTLB (-28.058). GTLB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -39.54M vs. FROG (-56.54M). GTLB has more cash in the bank: 1.36B vs. FROG (741M). GTLB has less debt than FROG: GTLB (187K) vs FROG (16.4M). GTLB has higher revenues than FROG: GTLB (1.01B) vs FROG (563M).
FROGGTLBFROG / GTLB
Capitalization9.53B4.56B209%
EBITDA-56.54M-39.54M143%
Gain YTD26.017-28.058-93%
P/E RatioN/A521.22-
Revenue563M1.01B56%
Total Cash741M1.36B55%
Total Debt16.4M187K8,770%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FROGGTLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FROG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GTLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XHS123.221.08
+0.88%
Stt Strt® SPDR® S&P®HlthCrSvcsETF
NML9.750.07
+0.72%
Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund Inc.
XTR28.11-0.30
-1.06%
Global X S&P 500® Tail Risk ETF
MGC269.03-4.08
-1.49%
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
NVII24.04-1.31
-5.17%
REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF

FROG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FROG has been closely correlated with RAMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FROG jumps, then RAMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FROG
1D Price
Change %
FROG100%
-1.48%
RAMP - FROG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
COIN - FROG
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.04%
CLSK - FROG
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
GTLB - FROG
54%
Loosely correlated
+4.53%
RIOT - FROG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More

GTLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLB
1D Price
Change %
GTLB100%
+4.53%
HUBS - GTLB
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
TEAM - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
COIN - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.04%
OKTA - GTLB
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
FRSH - GTLB
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.91%
More