Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRORX vs FTGAX
FRORX vs FTGAX Comparison
Open Charts FRORX vs FTGAX
FRORX vs FTGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRORX vs. FTGAX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRORX is a Hold and FTGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRORX has more cash in the bank: 813M vs. FTGAX (264M). FRORX pays higher dividends than FTGAX: FRORX (3.51) vs FTGAX (3.11). FRORX was incepted earlier than FTGAX: FRORX (39 years) vs FTGAX (39 years). FTGAX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FRORX (0.66). FRORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.43 vs. FTGAX (10.73). FRORX (4%) and FTGAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRORX (1000) and FTGAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRORX (8.05) and FTGAX (7.96) have marching annual gain over last year. FRORX return over 5 years is better than : -0.63 vs. FTGAX (-0.72).
| FRORX | FTGAX | FRORX / FTGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.75 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.75 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.800 | 1.887 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 813M | 264M | 308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 3.11 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.05 | 7.96 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.52 | 11.17 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.63 | -0.72 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.90 | 1.17 | 247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement