Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSGX vs PEMGX
FRSGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FRSGX vs PEMGX
FRSGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSGX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. FRSGX (3.61B). FRSGX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRSGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FRSGX (34 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). PEMGX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FRSGX (0.85). FRSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.86 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FRSGX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRSGX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.94 vs. PEMGX (-12.39). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.84 vs. FRSGX (-22.22).
| FRSGX | PEMGX | FRSGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.90 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.960 | -6.064 | -115% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.61B | 23.7B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.94 | -12.39 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.43 | 14.28 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.22 | -2.84 | 781% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.47 | 84.53 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers