Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSGX vs PEMGX
FRSGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FRSGX vs PEMGX
FRSGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSGX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. FRSGX (3.36B). FRSGX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRSGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FRSGX (35 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). PEMGX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FRSGX (0.85). FRSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.96 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FRSGX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRSGX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.28 vs. PEMGX (-18.39). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -8.19 vs. FRSGX (-28.58).
| FRSGX | PEMGX | FRSGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.90 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.90 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.601 | -7.292 | -49% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.36B | 21.4B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.28 | -18.39 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.07 | 10.28 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.58 | -8.19 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.14 | 73.29 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers