Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSGX vs PEMGX
FRSGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FRSGX vs PEMGX
FRSGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSGX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. FRSGX (3.48B). FRSGX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRSGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FRSGX (34 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). PEMGX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FRSGX (0.85). FRSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.86 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FRSGX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FRSGX (1000) and PEMGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.21 vs. PEMGX (-14.48). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -5.82 vs. FRSGX (-25.22).
| FRSGX | PEMGX | FRSGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.90 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.730 | -4.591 | -103% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.48B | 23.1B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.21 | -14.48 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.70 | 11.28 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.22 | -5.82 | 434% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.78 | 76.25 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement