FRSH
Price
$14.05
Change
-$0.68 (-4.62%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.43B
17 days until earnings call
LYFT
Price
$14.91
Change
-$0.75 (-4.79%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
7.74B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSH vs LYFT

Header iconFRSH vs LYFT Comparison
Open Charts FRSH vs LYFTBanner chart's image
Freshworks
Price$14.05
Change-$0.68 (-4.62%)
Volume$2.67M
Capitalization5.43B
Lyft
Price$14.91
Change-$0.75 (-4.79%)
Volume$10.85M
Capitalization7.74B
FRSH vs LYFT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSH vs. LYFT commentary
Jul 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a StrongBuy and LYFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSH: $14.05 vs. LYFT: $14.91)
Brand notoriety: FRSH: Not notable vs. LYFT: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 110% vs. LYFT: 63%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $5.43B vs. LYFT: $7.74B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.43B. LYFT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $7.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLYFT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than LYFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LYFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYFT is a better buy in the short-term than FRSH.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -7.57% price change this week, while LYFT (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

LYFT is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.86% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYFT($7.74B) has a higher market cap than FRSH($5.43B). LYFT YTD gains are higher at: 15.581 vs. FRSH (-13.111). FRSH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -158.03M vs. LYFT (-188.97M). LYFT has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. FRSH (1.19B). FRSH has less debt than LYFT: FRSH (29.5M) vs LYFT (1.04B). LYFT has higher revenues than FRSH: LYFT (4.4B) vs FRSH (596M).
FRSHLYFTFRSH / LYFT
Capitalization5.43B7.74B70%
EBITDA-158.03M-188.97M84%
Gain YTD-13.11115.581-84%
P/E Ratio1.54N/A-
Revenue596M4.4B14%
Total Cash1.19B1.69B71%
Total Debt29.5M1.04B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs LYFT: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
LYFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
658
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
9275
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2197
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (50) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LYFT (75) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's SMR Rating (75) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (92) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (56) in the Restaurants industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYFT (97) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHLYFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAMOX29.12N/A
N/A
Cambiar Opportunity Inv
TMVAX27.66N/A
N/A
RBC Microcap Value A
CIPIX24.76N/A
N/A
Champlain Mid Cap Institutional
RLIEX19.33N/A
N/A
Lazard International Equity R6
FFIFX26.77-0.11
-0.41%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529F3

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
-4.65%
QTWO - FRSH
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.67%
CNNE - FRSH
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
COIN - FRSH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
CLSK - FRSH
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
HUBS - FRSH
62%
Loosely correlated
-5.33%
More