Ad is loading...
FRSLX vs FSMAX
FRSLX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs FSMAX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$23.33
Change+$0.12 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.01M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$83.22
Change+$0.45 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
FRSLX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. FRSLX (156M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: FSMAX (0.53) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FRSLX (30 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FRSLX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: FSMAX (0) vs FRSLX (3000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.44 vs. FRSLX (-9.16). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 96.19 vs. FRSLX (1.98).
| FRSLX | FSMAX | FRSLX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.04 | 3,343% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.04 | 3,571% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.850 | -8.924 | 133% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 36.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.16 | 0.44 | -2,101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.01 | 6.93 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.98 | 96.19 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.63 | 54.53 | -84% |