Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs FSMAX
FRSLX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs FSMAX
FRSLX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. FRSLX (182M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FRSLX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FRSLX (0.00). FRSLX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FRSLX (31 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FRSLX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: FSMAX (0) vs FRSLX (3000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. FRSLX (15.29). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. FRSLX (-23.15).
| FRSLX | FSMAX | FRSLX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.04 | 3,229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.04 | 3,486% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.168 | 15.427 | 124% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 182M | 42.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.29 | 29.23 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.58 | 73.83 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.15 | 33.65 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.60 | 153.47 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement