Ad is loading...
FRSLX vs PEMGX
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PEMGX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$23.33
Change+$0.12 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.01M
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PEMGX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a StrongBuy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. FRSLX (156M). FRSLX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRSLX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FRSLX (30 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). FRSLX (1.25) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.95). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). FRSLX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PEMGX (1000) vs FRSLX (3000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.10 vs. FRSLX (-9.16). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 93.35 vs. FRSLX (1.98).
| FRSLX | PEMGX | FRSLX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.95 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.95 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.850 | -0.469 | 2,525% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 29.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.16 | 5.10 | -179% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.01 | 18.36 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.98 | 93.35 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.63 | 84.15 | -54% |