Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs PEMGX
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PEMGX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp A
Price$26.99
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.12M
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. FRSLX (159M). FRSLX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRSLX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FRSLX (31 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). FRSLX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). FRSLX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PEMGX (1000) vs FRSLX (3000). FRSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.16 vs. PEMGX (-6.54). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 24.68 vs. FRSLX (-28.43).
| FRSLX | PEMGX | FRSLX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.317 | -0.680 | -340% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 30.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.16 | -6.54 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.20 | 32.28 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.43 | 24.68 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.65 | 89.67 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers