Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs PEMGX
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PEMGX
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. FRSLX (173M). FRSLX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRSLX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FRSLX (32 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FRSLX (1.22) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FRSLX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PEMGX (1000) vs FRSLX (3000). FRSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.94 vs. PEMGX (-13.38). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.33 vs. FRSLX (-26.16).
| FRSLX | PEMGX | FRSLX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.90 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.90 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.525 | -4.297 | -315% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 23.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.94 | -13.38 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.03 | 11.31 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.16 | -2.33 | 1,123% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.59 | 77.19 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement