Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs PEMGX
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PEMGX
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. FRSLX (182M). FRSLX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRSLX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FRSLX (31 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FRSLX (1.22) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FRSLX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PEMGX (1000) vs FRSLX (3000). FRSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.29 vs. PEMGX (-14.32). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -4.63 vs. FRSLX (-23.15).
| FRSLX | PEMGX | FRSLX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.90 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.90 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.168 | -7.022 | -273% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 182M | 23.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.29 | -14.32 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.58 | 13.11 | 294% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.15 | -4.63 | 500% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.60 | 82.65 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers