Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSLX vs PEMGX
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FRSLX vs PEMGX
FRSLX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSLX vs. PEMGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSLX is a StrongBuy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. FRSLX (162M). FRSLX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRSLX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: FRSLX (32 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). FRSLX (1.22) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). FRSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). FRSLX (6%) and PEMGX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRSLX: PEMGX (1000) vs FRSLX (3000). FRSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.04 vs. PEMGX (-14.48). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : -5.82 vs. FRSLX (-32.53).
| FRSLX | PEMGX | FRSLX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.90 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.90 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.243 | -4.591 | -158% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162M | 23.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.04 | -14.48 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.90 | 11.28 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.53 | -5.82 | 559% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.38 | 76.25 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers