FRST
Price
$11.29
Change
+$0.25 (+2.26%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
300.52M
21 days until earnings call
MFG
Price
$5.62
Change
+$0.02 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.2B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRST vs MFG

Header iconFRST vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts FRST vs MFGBanner chart's image
Primis Financial
Price$11.29
Change+$0.25 (+2.26%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization300.52M
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$5.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization49.2B
FRST vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRST vs. MFG commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRST is a StrongBuy and MFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FRST: $11.29 vs. MFG: $5.63)
Brand notoriety: FRST and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRST: 38% vs. MFG: 69%
Market capitalization -- FRST: $300.52M vs. MFG: $49.2B
FRST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $300.52M. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $49.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than FRST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRST and MFG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRST (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.11% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRST is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($49.2B) has a higher market cap than FRST($301M). FRST has higher P/E ratio than MFG: FRST (29.63) vs MFG (11.31). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 15.133 vs. FRST (-1.263). FRST has less debt than MFG: FRST (95.5M) vs MFG (20.53T). MFG has higher revenues than FRST: MFG (2.88T) vs FRST (152M).
FRSTMFGFRST / MFG
Capitalization301M49.2B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.26315.133-8%
P/E Ratio29.6311.31262%
Revenue152M2.88T0%
Total Cash24MN/A-
Total Debt95.5M20.53T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRST vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
FRST
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1776
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8219
SMR RATING
1..100
411
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
670
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (49) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FRST (78) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to FRST’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRST (82) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRST (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRST’s over the last 12 months.

FRST's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (49) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FRST’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

FRST's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (70) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FRST’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSTMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVLC77.680.65
+0.84%
Calvert US Large-Cp Cor Rspnb ETF
IYR95.800.09
+0.09%
iShares US Real Estate ETF
AUGP28.66N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Aug
CURE79.73N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3X ETF
ZHDG21.38N/A
N/A
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF

FRST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRST has been closely correlated with PFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRST jumps, then PFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRST
1D Price
Change %
FRST100%
+2.26%
PFS - FRST
85%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
UCB - FRST
84%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
FIBK - FRST
84%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
FRME - FRST
84%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
HOPE - FRST
83%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+0.72%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
HBAN - MFG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
RF - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
SNV - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More