FRSX
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.01 (-2.70%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.82M
LIDR
Price
$2.84
Change
+$0.42 (+17.36%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSX vs LIDR

Header iconFRSX vs LIDR Comparison
Open Charts FRSX vs LIDRBanner chart's image
Foresight Autonomous Holdings
Price$0.36
Change-$0.01 (-2.70%)
Volume$19.29K
Capitalization15.82M
AEye
Price$2.84
Change+$0.42 (+17.36%)
Volume$99.9K
Capitalization7.84M
FRSX vs LIDR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRSX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSX vs. LIDR commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSX is a Hold and LIDR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FRSX: $0.37 vs. LIDR: $2.42)
Brand notoriety: FRSX and LIDR are both not notable
FRSX represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while LIDR is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSX: 16% vs. LIDR: 22%
Market capitalization -- FRSX: $15.82M vs. LIDR: $7.84M
FRSX [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $15.82M. LIDR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $7.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIDR is a better buy in the long-term than FRSX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIDR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIDR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIDR is a better buy in the short-term than FRSX.

Price Growth

FRSX (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -10.04% price change this week, while LIDR (@Packaged Software) price change was -31.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.31% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Packaged Software (-1.60% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSX($15.8M) has a higher market cap than LIDR($7.84M). LIDR YTD gains are higher at: 90.551 vs. FRSX (-74.993). FRSX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -17.59M vs. LIDR (-81.44M). LIDR has more cash in the bank: 45.9M vs. FRSX (17.7M). FRSX has less debt than LIDR: FRSX (1.83M) vs LIDR (15.5M). LIDR has higher revenues than FRSX: LIDR (2.49M) vs FRSX (357K).
FRSXLIDRFRSX / LIDR
Capitalization15.8M7.84M202%
EBITDA-17.59M-81.44M22%
Gain YTD-74.99390.551-83%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue357K2.49M14%
Total Cash17.7M45.9M39%
Total Debt1.83M15.5M12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSX: Fundamental Ratings
FRSX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSXLIDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AOSL26.200.13
+0.50%
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
KFY70.46N/A
N/A
Korn Ferry
FACT10.28-0.01
-0.10%
Fact II Acquisition Corp
NCRA1.59-0.01
-0.62%
Nocera
VST200.85-8.75
-4.17%
Vistra Corp

FRSX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRSX and SYPR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRSX and SYPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSX
1D Price
Change %
FRSX100%
-1.57%
SYPR - FRSX
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
CREV - FRSX
26%
Poorly correlated
+9.79%
LIDR - FRSX
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.36%
MNRO - FRSX
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
MLR - FRSX
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More

LIDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIDR has been loosely correlated with QS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIDR jumps, then QS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIDR
1D Price
Change %
LIDR100%
-9.36%
QS - LIDR
39%
Loosely correlated
-4.72%
INVZ - LIDR
37%
Loosely correlated
-6.21%
ARBE - LIDR
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
HYLN - LIDR
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
HOOD - LIDR
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More