Compare trend and price HYLN vs LIDR
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HYLN is a Hold and LIDR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HYLN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIDR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HYLN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LIDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HYLN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIDR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HYLN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LIDR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HYLN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +26.83% price change this week, while LIDR (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.32%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
HYLN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2024.
LIDR is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.42% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Packaged Software (+1.50% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| HYLN | LIDR | HYLN / LIDR | |
| Capitalization | 348M | 7.84M | 4,439% |
| EBITDA | -122.38M | -81.44M | 150% |
| Gain YTD | 91.717 | -56.332 | -163% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 672K | 2.49M | 27% |
| Total Cash | 163M | 45.9M | 355% |
| Total Debt | 7.64M | 15.5M | 49% |
| HYLN | LIDR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
HYLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYLN has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYLN jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HYLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYLN | 100% | +20.93% | ||
| AEVA - HYLN | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| XPEL - HYLN | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| GGR - HYLN | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| LIDR - HYLN | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| DAN - HYLN | 33% Loosely correlated | +6.68% | ||
More | ||||
LIDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIDR has been loosely correlated with QS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIDR jumps, then QS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIDR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIDR | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| QS - LIDR | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| INVZ - LIDR | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| HYLN - LIDR | 34% Loosely correlated | +20.93% | ||
| HOOD - LIDR | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| LAZR - LIDR | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||