Ad is loading...
FRT
Price
$113.54
Change
+$0.17 (+0.15%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
92 days until earnings call
REG
Price
$73.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRT vs REG

Header iconFRT vs REG Comparison
Open Charts FRT vs REGBanner chart's image
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$113.54
Change+$0.17 (+0.15%)
Volume$2.7M
CapitalizationN/A
Regency Centers
Price$73.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.84M
CapitalizationN/A
FRT vs REG Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
REG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRT vs. REG commentary
Nov 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Sell and REG is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 17, 2024
Stock price -- (FRT: $113.54 vs. REG: $73.66)
Brand notoriety: FRT and REG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 363% vs. REG: 371%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $8.36B vs. REG: $11.19B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $8.36B. REG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $11.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileREG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • REG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, REG is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • REG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than REG.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.71% price change this week, while REG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

REG is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.85% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REG($11.2B) has a higher market cap than FRT($8.36B). FRT has higher P/E ratio than REG: FRT (35.98) vs REG (29.24). FRT (13.663) and REG (13.406) have similar YTD gains . REG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 879M vs. FRT (737M). FRT has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. REG (85M). REG has less debt than FRT: REG (4.4B) vs FRT (4.69B). REG has higher revenues than FRT: REG (1.32B) vs FRT (1.13B).
FRTREGFRT / REG
Capitalization8.36B11.2B75%
EBITDA737M879M84%
Gain YTD13.66313.406102%
P/E Ratio35.9829.24123%
Revenue1.13B1.32B86%
Total Cash251M85M295%
Total Debt4.69B4.4B107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs REG: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
REG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3191
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9850
SMR RATING
1..100
6878
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3428
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (76) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (83). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

REG's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (98). This means that REG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (68) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (78). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

REG's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (34). This means that REG’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as REG (43). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to REG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTREG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
REG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXZ62.98-0.03
-0.05%
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX® ETF
DGIN43.07-0.38
-0.88%
VanEck Digital India ETF
APLY17.56-0.16
-0.90%
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
FLQM56.43-0.61
-1.07%
Franklin US Mid Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
IWF387.55-8.25
-2.08%
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with REG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then REG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+0.15%
REG - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
KIM - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
BRX - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
KRG - FRT
82%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
UE - FRT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
More

REG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, REG has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if REG jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To REG
1D Price
Change %
REG100%
N/A
FRT - REG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
KIM - REG
83%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
BRX - REG
80%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
KRG - REG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
PECO - REG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
More