FRT
Price
$124.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
10.72B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SKT
Price
$40.66
Change
-$0.34 (-0.83%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.67B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRT vs SKT

FRT vs SKT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) vs. Tanger Inc. (SKT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • FRT and SKT are both retail-focused real estate investment trusts (REITs — companies that own and operate income-producing real estate), but they serve different segments of the retail property market, with FRT emphasizing mixed-use coastal developments and SKT concentrating on outlet and open-air shopping centers.
  • FRT holds the longest consecutive dividend increase streak in the REIT sector at 58 years, reinforcing its reputation for income consistency and capital stewardship.
  • SKT has achieved record-high tenant sales productivity of $475 per square foot and portfolio occupancy of approximately 98%, reflecting robust operational momentum.
  • Over the past year, both stocks have delivered strong total returns exceeding 37%, though SKT has exhibited higher beta (a measure of volatility relative to the broader market) and a more elevated price-to-earnings multiple.
  • Analyst consensus currently leans more favorably toward FRT, with a higher proportion of Buy ratings and a stronger aggregate sentiment score.
  • On fundamental metrics such as net margin and dividend yield, FRT maintains a measurable advantage, while SKT leads on occupancy rates and recent same-center net operating income growth.

Introduction

The retail REIT sector has experienced a notable resurgence over the past several years, driven by limited new construction supply, resilient consumer spending, and landlords' success in remerchandising properties with experiential tenants. Within this landscape, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Tanger Inc. (SKT) represent two distinct approaches to retail real estate — one rooted in high-barrier coastal mixed-use developments, and the other in the value-oriented outlet center model. This comparison is especially relevant for investors evaluating relative performance, dividend reliability, growth trajectories, and risk profiles within the retail REIT space. Whether prioritizing income stability or operational momentum, understanding the trade-offs between these two names can help inform positioning in the current market environment.

FRT Overview and Recent Performance

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is one of the oldest and most established retail REITs in the United States. Founded in 1962 and headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, the trust owns, operates, and redevelops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties concentrated in affluent coastal markets — including the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, California, and South Florida. Its portfolio encompasses approximately 104 properties, roughly 3,800 tenants, 29 million square feet of commercial space, and about 2,500 residential units. Signature destinations such as Santana Row in San Jose, Pike & Rose in Maryland, and Assembly Row near Boston exemplify its strategy of creating vibrant, multi-purpose environments.

In recent market activity, FRT shares have traded near the upper end of their 52-week range, buoyed by strong leasing volumes and improving occupancy. For full-year 2025, the company reported core funds from operations (FFO — a key REIT earnings metric that adds depreciation and amortization back to net income) of $7.06 per share, up 4.3% year over year, on revenue of approximately $1.28 billion. Leasing spreads reached their strongest levels in more than a decade, with comparable cash rent increases of 15%. Management has guided for further FFO growth of roughly 5.1% to 6.5% in 2026. Additionally, FRT extended its record as the REIT with the longest streak of consecutive annual dividend increases — now at 58 years — reinforcing its appeal among income-oriented investors. The portfolio ended 2025 with comparable occupancy of 94.5% and a leased rate of 96.6%.

SKT Overview and Recent Performance

Tanger Inc. (SKT), headquartered in Greensboro, North Carolina, is a leading owner and operator of upscale outlet and open-air retail shopping destinations. The company has been publicly listed as a REIT since 1993 and currently manages a portfolio spanning more than 15 million square feet across 38 premium outlet centers, one managed facility, and one open-air lifestyle center in 20 U.S. states and Canada. Tanger's properties are strategically positioned in high-traffic tourist corridors and vibrant suburban markets, hosting over 3,000 stores from more than 700 brand-name retailers.

Recent market activity has reflected growing investor confidence in SKT's operational execution. The company reported full-year 2025 revenue of approximately $582 million, a 10.5% increase from the prior year, with core FFO landing between $2.28 and $2.32 per share. Portfolio occupancy reached roughly 98% by year-end, while average tenant sales per square foot hit an all-time high of $475 over the twelve months through September 2025 — up from $438 a year earlier. Same-center net operating income (NOI — a measure of property-level profitability excluding corporate overhead) grew approximately 3.9% through the first nine months of 2025. SKT also executed an active external growth strategy, adding six new centers to its portfolio over a two-year period, including the acquisition of Legends Outlets in Kansas City. The company has raised its dividend for four consecutive years, and its low-leveraged balance sheet has provided flexibility for opportunistic acquisitions.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment where stock selection and timing are increasingly driven by data, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway to the platform's most relevant automated trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots — each with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters — that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only the strongest-performing and most market-adaptive bots earn a spot in this featured section at any given time. Top-performing bots in the Tickeron ecosystem have posted annualized returns ranging from approximately 78% to over 290%, with some strategies achieving Sharpe ratios above 2.0 and closed-trade profits exceeding $100,000 on model accounts. These bots span multiple timeframes — including 5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute configurations — and deploy diverse approaches such as trend following, pattern recognition, and multi-agent collaboration. For traders and investors seeking to complement their own analysis with AI-driven signals, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can serve as a practical starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both FRT and SKT operate within the retail REIT sector, their business models diverge in important ways. FRT focuses on grocery-anchored shopping centers and mixed-use developments in densely populated, high-income coastal metros where supply constraints create durable pricing power. SKT, by contrast, specializes in outlet centers that benefit from value-conscious consumer behavior and tourist-driven foot traffic. This distinction shapes their growth drivers: FRT leans on redevelopment, residential integration, and premium lease spreads, while SKT pursues external acquisitions and tenant mix evolution — adding more restaurants, entertainment, and non-traditional retailers.

On financial metrics, the contrasts sharpen. FRT reports a net margin of approximately 39%, nearly double SKT's roughly 21%. FRT also offers a higher dividend yield of about 3.6% versus 3.0% for SKT, and trades at a notably lower price-to-earnings ratio — around 21 times trailing earnings compared to approximately 37 for SKT. However, SKT has posted stronger occupancy figures (roughly 98% versus 94.5%) and higher return on equity (approximately 17.5% versus 16%), reflecting efficient capital deployment. In terms of risk, SKT's beta of 1.09 implies slightly above-market volatility, while FRT's beta of 0.93 signals marginally below-market sensitivity. Institutional ownership is high for both — roughly 94% for FRT and 85% for SKT — reflecting broad professional confidence in the retail REIT recovery.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative valuation, earnings quality, and market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) in the current environment. The combination of a superior net margin profile, a lower price-to-earnings multiple, a higher dividend yield backed by 58 years of consecutive increases, and strong leasing momentum in supply-constrained coastal markets collectively points toward more stable risk-adjusted return potential. That said, SKT presents a compelling growth narrative with record occupancy and tenant sales productivity, and its more aggressive acquisition strategy could generate stronger upside in scenarios where consumer spending on value retail remains robust. The AI verdict is probabilistic — not absolute — and reflects the balance of fundamental quality, valuation discipline, and trend consistency rather than a single metric in isolation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FRT vs. SKT commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRT is a Hold and SKT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FRT: $124.09 vs. SKT: $40.66)
Brand notoriety: FRT: Not notable vs. SKT: Notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRT: 133% vs. SKT: 98%
Market capitalization -- FRT: $10.72B vs. SKT: $4.67B
FRT [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $10.72B. SKT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $4.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSKT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SKT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKT is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SKT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than SKT.

Price Growth

FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.58% price change this week, while SKT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -4.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

SKT is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-4.56% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($10.7B) has a higher market cap than SKT($4.67B). SKT has higher P/E ratio than FRT: SKT (38.36) vs FRT (25.07). FRT YTD gains are higher at: 27.002 vs. SKT (24.945). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03B vs. SKT (352M). SKT has less debt than FRT: SKT (1.96B) vs FRT (4.85B). FRT has higher revenues than SKT: FRT (1.34B) vs SKT (597M).
FRTSKTFRT / SKT
Capitalization10.7B4.67B229%
EBITDA1.03B352M294%
Gain YTD27.00224.945108%
P/E Ratio25.0738.3665%
Revenue1.34B597M224%
Total Cash107MN/A-
Total Debt4.85B1.96B248%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT vs SKT: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
SKT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8492
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
607
SMR RATING
1..100
6148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5739
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRT's Valuation (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SKT (89). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to SKT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (60). This means that SKT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's SMR Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (61). This means that SKT’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SKT (41). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to SKT’s over the last 12 months.

SKT's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (57). This means that SKT’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRTSKT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SKT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QLD83.670.99
+1.20%
ProShares Ultra QQQ
KDVD28.49N/A
N/A
Keeley Dividend ETF
YSEP27.92-0.04
-0.14%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bfr ETF Sep
EMD10.47-0.04
-0.38%
Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund
DZZ1.90-0.01
-0.55%
DB Gold Double Short ETN