Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAEX vs RWMFX
FSAEX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSAEX vs RWMFX
FSAEX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAEX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAEX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FSAEX (5.76B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FSAEX: RWMFX (1.41) vs FSAEX (0.91). FSAEX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FSAEX (18 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FSAEX (0.00). FSAEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). FSAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FSAEX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FSAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. RWMFX (2.09). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. FSAEX (25.39).
| FSAEX | RWMFX | FSAEX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.952 | 4.508 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.41 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.47 | 2.09 | 454% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.25 | 30.24 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.39 | 27.39 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.27 | 82.36 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement