Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs IIGCX
FSAGX vs IIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs IIGCX
FSAGX vs IIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. IIGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and IIGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. IIGCX (1.48B). IIGCX pays higher dividends than FSAGX: IIGCX (6.52) vs FSAGX (4.78). FSAGX was incepted earlier than IIGCX: FSAGX (41 years) vs IIGCX (23 years). IIGCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.64). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. IIGCX (30.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than IIGCX: FSAGX (0) vs IIGCX (1000). IIGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 69.10 vs. FSAGX (52.86). IIGCX return over 5 years is better than : 166.02 vs. FSAGX (120.82).
| FSAGX | IIGCX | FSAGX / IIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.12 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.12 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.231 | 1.072 | -115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.23B | 1.48B | 286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.78 | 6.52 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.86 | 69.10 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 180.50 | 220.01 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 120.82 | 166.02 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.99 | 239.47 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement