Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs IIGCX
FSAGX vs IIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs IIGCX
FSAGX vs IIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. IIGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and IIGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. IIGCX (1.72B). IIGCX pays higher dividends than FSAGX: IIGCX (5.96) vs FSAGX (4.29). FSAGX was incepted earlier than IIGCX: FSAGX (41 years) vs IIGCX (23 years). IIGCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.64). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. IIGCX (30.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than IIGCX: FSAGX (0) vs IIGCX (1000). IIGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.83 vs. FSAGX (42.00). IIGCX return over 5 years is better than : 241.58 vs. FSAGX (181.93).
| FSAGX | IIGCX | FSAGX / IIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.12 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.12 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.159 | 18.080 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 1.72B | 259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.29 | 5.96 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.00 | 51.83 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 242.58 | 289.42 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.93 | 241.58 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 219.05 | 289.85 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement