Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UIPMX
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UIPMX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$41.87
Change+$0.27 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Instl
Price$33.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets812.96M
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UIPMX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and UIPMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.33B vs. UIPMX (813M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FSAGX (2.25) vs UIPMX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FSAGX (40 years) vs UIPMX (17 years). UIPMX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. UIPMX (1.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FSAGX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). FSAGX (62.36) and UIPMX (59.98) have marching annual gain over last year. UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. FSAGX (38.39).
| FSAGX | UIPMX | FSAGX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.01 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.10 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 69.243 | 72.185 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 813M | 286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.36 | 59.98 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.26 | 124.39 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.39 | 47.63 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 225.35 | 274.37 | 82% |