Ad is loading...
FSAGX vs UIPMX
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UIPMX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$36.80
Change+$1.06 (+2.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Instl
Price$29.42
Change+$0.79 (+2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.88M
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UIPMX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and UIPMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. UIPMX (718M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FSAGX (2.35) vs UIPMX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FSAGX (39 years) vs UIPMX (17 years). UIPMX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. UIPMX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FSAGX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). FSAGX (48.38) and UIPMX (47.96) have marching annual gain over last year. UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 50.56 vs. FSAGX (35.16).
| FSAGX | UIPMX | FSAGX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.00 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.09 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.403 | 48.573 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 718M | 312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.38 | 47.96 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.34 | 60.12 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.16 | 50.56 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.11 | 141.84 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...