Ad is loading...
FSAGX vs UIPMX
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UIPMX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$33.10
Change+$0.17 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Instl
Price$26.75
Change+$0.13 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets667.19M
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UIPMX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and UIPMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. UIPMX (667M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FSAGX (2.71) vs UIPMX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FSAGX (39 years) vs UIPMX (17 years). UIPMX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.70). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. UIPMX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FSAGX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). UIPMX (44.60) and FSAGX (43.59) have marching annual gain over last year. UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 95.53 vs. FSAGX (76.90).
| FSAGX | UIPMX | FSAGX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.00 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.09 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.971 | 38.142 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 667M | 290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.59 | 44.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.69 | 23.01 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.90 | 95.53 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.61 | 136.88 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...