Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UIPMX
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UIPMX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$40.02
Change+$0.70 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Instl
Price$31.79
Change+$0.63 (+2.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets780.17M
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UIPMX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and UIPMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. UIPMX (780M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FSAGX (2.29) vs UIPMX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FSAGX (40 years) vs UIPMX (17 years). UIPMX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. UIPMX (1.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FSAGX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). FSAGX (72.23) and UIPMX (70.83) have marching annual gain over last year. UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 71.96 vs. FSAGX (60.17).
| FSAGX | UIPMX | FSAGX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.00 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.09 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 59.967 | 61.702 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 780M | 288% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.23 | 70.83 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.72 | 87.18 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.17 | 71.96 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.47 | 189.17 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers