Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UIPMX
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UIPMX
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UIPMX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and UIPMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 3.32B vs. UIPMX (1.34B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FSAGX (5.71) vs UIPMX (0.30). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FSAGX (41 years) vs UIPMX (18 years). UIPMX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.64). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UIPMX (15.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FSAGX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). UIPMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 77.76 vs. FSAGX (69.99). UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 245.11 vs. FSAGX (200.99).
| FSAGX | UIPMX | FSAGX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.01 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.04 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.735 | 21.836 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 1.34B | 249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.71 | 0.30 | 1,932% |
| Returns for 1 year | 69.99 | 77.76 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 258.60 | 287.25 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 200.99 | 245.11 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.50 | 268.67 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement