Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UIPMX
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UIPMX
FSAGX vs UIPMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UIPMX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and UIPMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. UIPMX (1.24B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UIPMX: FSAGX (4.29) vs UIPMX (0.22). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UIPMX: FSAGX (41 years) vs UIPMX (18 years). UIPMX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.64). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UIPMX (15.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UIPMX: FSAGX (0) vs UIPMX (1000000). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.34 vs. UIPMX (40.92). UIPMX return over 5 years is better than : 216.83 vs. FSAGX (184.58).
| FSAGX | UIPMX | FSAGX / UIPMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.01 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.04 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.263 | 13.630 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 1.24B | 358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.29 | 0.22 | 1,938% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.34 | 40.92 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 245.81 | 248.90 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 184.58 | 216.83 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 222.06 | 273.46 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement