Ad is loading...
FSAGX vs UPMMX
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UPMMX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$33.10
Change+$0.17 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Cl A
Price$25.75
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets667.19M
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UPMMX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and UPMMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. UPMMX (667M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UPMMX: FSAGX (2.71) vs UPMMX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UPMMX: FSAGX (39 years) vs UPMMX (15 years). UPMMX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.70). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. UPMMX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UPMMX: FSAGX (0) vs UPMMX (2500). UPMMX (44.09) and FSAGX (43.59) have marching annual gain over last year. UPMMX return over 5 years is better than : 92.34 vs. FSAGX (76.90).
| FSAGX | UPMMX | FSAGX / UPMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.34 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.41 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.971 | 38.039 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 667M | 290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.59 | 44.09 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.69 | 21.74 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.90 | 92.34 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.61 | 128.28 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...