Ad is loading...
FSAGX vs UPMMX
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UPMMX
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Cl A
Price$19.71
Change+$0.16 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.41M
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UPMMX commentary
Jan 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and UPMMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.3B vs. UPMMX (517M). UPMMX pays higher dividends than FSAGX: UPMMX (2.26) vs FSAGX (0.97). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UPMMX: FSAGX (39 years) vs UPMMX (14 years). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. UPMMX (4.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UPMMX: FSAGX (0) vs UPMMX (2500). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.12 vs. UPMMX (25.16). UPMMX return over 5 years is better than : 26.32 vs. FSAGX (22.46).
| FSAGX | UPMMX | FSAGX / UPMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.411 | 5.334 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 517M | 252% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 2.26 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.12 | 25.16 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.60 | 12.73 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.46 | 26.32 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.61 | 60.58 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...