Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UPMMX
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UPMMX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$36.17
Change+$0.82 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Cl A
Price$27.83
Change+$0.65 (+2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets701.58M
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UPMMX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and UPMMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. UPMMX (702M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UPMMX: FSAGX (2.35) vs UPMMX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UPMMX: FSAGX (39 years) vs UPMMX (15 years). UPMMX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. UPMMX (1.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UPMMX: FSAGX (0) vs UPMMX (2500). FSAGX (40.40) and UPMMX (39.10) have marching annual gain over last year. UPMMX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. FSAGX (31.84).
| FSAGX | UPMMX | FSAGX / UPMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.34 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.41 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.816 | 46.444 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 702M | 319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.40 | 39.10 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.87 | 55.43 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.84 | 42.85 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.81 | 133.64 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement