Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UPMMX
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UPMMX
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UPMMX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and UPMMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 3.32B vs. UPMMX (1.34B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UPMMX: FSAGX (5.71) vs UPMMX (0.14). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UPMMX: FSAGX (41 years) vs UPMMX (16 years). UPMMX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.64). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UPMMX (15.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UPMMX: FSAGX (0) vs UPMMX (2500). UPMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 77.10 vs. FSAGX (69.99). UPMMX return over 5 years is better than : 239.34 vs. FSAGX (200.99).
| FSAGX | UPMMX | FSAGX / UPMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.735 | 21.546 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 1.34B | 249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.71 | 0.14 | 4,066% |
| Returns for 1 year | 69.99 | 77.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 258.60 | 283.24 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 200.99 | 239.34 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.50 | 254.91 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers