Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAGX vs UPMMX
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UPMMX
FSAGX vs UPMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UPMMX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and UPMMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. UPMMX (1.21B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UPMMX: FSAGX (4.29) vs UPMMX (0.11). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UPMMX: FSAGX (41 years) vs UPMMX (16 years). UPMMX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.64). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. UPMMX (15.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UPMMX: FSAGX (0) vs UPMMX (2500). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.92 vs. UPMMX (36.03). UPMMX return over 5 years is better than : 207.97 vs. FSAGX (182.65).
| FSAGX | UPMMX | FSAGX / UPMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.35 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.020 | 10.435 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 1.21B | 368% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.29 | 0.11 | 4,077% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.92 | 36.03 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 227.25 | 229.16 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.65 | 207.97 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 217.90 | 254.22 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement