Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSANX vs RLBAX
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSANX vs RLBAX
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSANX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSANX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSANX (5.65B). FSANX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSANX (1.83) vs RLBAX (1.11). FSANX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSANX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSANX (0.65). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSANX (29.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSANX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.60 vs. RLBAX (9.52). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.62 vs. FSANX (25.87).
| FSANX | RLBAX | FSANX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.32 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.32 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.377 | 7.341 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.65B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.11 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.60 | 9.52 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.92 | 34.60 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.87 | 27.62 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.05 | 71.38 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement