Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSANX vs RLBAX
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSANX vs RLBAX
FSANX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSANX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSANX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FSANX (5.6B). FSANX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSANX (1.85) vs RLBAX (1.13). FSANX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSANX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSANX (0.65). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSANX (29.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSANX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.87 vs. RLBAX (10.90). RLBAX (29.34) and FSANX (28.90) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSANX | RLBAX | FSANX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.32 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.32 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.951 | 9.852 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.6B | 283B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 1.13 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.87 | 10.90 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.39 | 40.91 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.90 | 29.34 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.69 | 74.89 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement