Ad is loading...
FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
Price$15.00
Change+$0.14 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.21B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$32.94
Change+$0.34 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.6B
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSATX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. FSATX (4.21B). FSATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSATX (1.56) vs RLBAX (1.27). FSATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSATX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.19). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FSATX (21.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.30 vs. RLBAX (0.86). FSATX return over 5 years is better than : 34.08 vs. RLBAX (28.50).
| FSATX | RLBAX | FSATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.33 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.33 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.129 | -4.026 | 78% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 225B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.27 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 0.86 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.88 | 10.01 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.08 | 28.50 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.13 | 37.45 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers