Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSATX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% M
Price$17.43
Change-$0.06 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.56
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSATX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. FSATX (4.68B). FSATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSATX (1.38) vs RLBAX (1.10). FSATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSATX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.19). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSATX (17.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.35 vs. RLBAX (9.12). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.04 vs. FSATX (35.07).
| FSATX | RLBAX | FSATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.016 | 13.770 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 266B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.10 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.35 | 9.12 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.72 | 47.98 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.07 | 38.04 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.56 | 68.72 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers