Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSATX vs RLBAX
FSATX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSATX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSATX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FSATX (5.7B). FSATX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSATX (1.36) vs RLBAX (1.12). FSATX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSATX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.20). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSATX (29.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSATX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. RLBAX (5.10). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.08 vs. FSATX (23.35).
| FSATX | RLBAX | FSATX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.32 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.32 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.834 | 7.371 | 133% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.7B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.70 | 5.10 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.82 | 38.04 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.35 | 27.08 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.70 | 73.89 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement