Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSAVX vs FSCPX
FSAVX vs FSCPX Comparison
Open Charts FSAVX vs FSCPX
FSAVX vs FSCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAVX vs. FSCPX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAVX is a Hold and FSCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 918M vs. FSAVX (60.9M). FSAVX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: FSAVX (0.61) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSAVX was incepted earlier than FSCPX: FSAVX (40 years) vs FSCPX (36 years). FSAVX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.69). FSAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. FSCPX (21.00). FSAVX (0) and FSCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.51 vs. FSAVX (-3.10). FSCPX return over 5 years is better than : -3.50 vs. FSAVX (-5.05).
| FSAVX | FSCPX | FSAVX / FSCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.69 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.69 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.931 | -4.239 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 60.9M | 918M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.04 | 1,604% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | 6.51 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.94 | 26.03 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.05 | -3.50 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.89 | 94.25 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers