Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBCX vs RIRBX
FSBCX vs RIRBX Comparison
Open Charts FSBCX vs RIRBX
FSBCX vs RIRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBCX vs. RIRBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBCX is a StrongBuy and RIRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FSBCX (285M). RIRBX pays higher dividends than FSBCX: RIRBX (1.96) vs FSBCX (1.25). FSBCX was incepted earlier than RIRBX: FSBCX (33 years) vs RIRBX (24 years). FSBCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RIRBX (1.35). FSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RIRBX (50.00). RIRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSBCX: RIRBX (250) vs FSBCX (1500). FSBCX (6.89) and RIRBX (6.78) have marching annual gain over last year. RIRBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.62 vs. FSBCX (5.46).
| FSBCX | RIRBX | FSBCX / RIRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.35 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.35 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.953 | 9.054 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.96 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.89 | 6.78 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.58 | 41.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.46 | 34.62 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.58 | 63.19 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement