Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBCX vs RIRBX
FSBCX vs RIRBX Comparison
Open Charts FSBCX vs RIRBX
FSBCX vs RIRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBCX vs. RIRBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBCX is a Buy and RIRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FSBCX (289M). RIRBX pays higher dividends than FSBCX: RIRBX (2.02) vs FSBCX (1.35). FSBCX was incepted earlier than RIRBX: FSBCX (33 years) vs RIRBX (24 years). FSBCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RIRBX (1.35). FSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RIRBX (50.00). RIRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSBCX: RIRBX (250) vs FSBCX (1500). FSBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. RIRBX (11.62). RIRBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.11 vs. FSBCX (6.34).
| FSBCX | RIRBX | FSBCX / RIRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.35 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.35 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.480 | 7.077 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 2.02 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.08 | 11.62 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.81 | 38.40 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.34 | 33.11 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.95 | 65.06 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement