Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBCX vs RIRCX
FSBCX vs RIRCX Comparison
Open Charts FSBCX vs RIRCX
FSBCX vs RIRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBCX vs. RIRCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBCX is a StrongBuy and RIRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRCX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. FSBCX (289M). RIRCX pays higher dividends than FSBCX: RIRCX (2.38) vs FSBCX (1.27). FSBCX was incepted earlier than RIRCX: FSBCX (33 years) vs RIRCX (24 years). FSBCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RIRCX (0.91). FSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RIRCX (50.00). RIRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSBCX: RIRCX (250) vs FSBCX (1500). RIRCX (11.48) and FSBCX (11.15) have marching annual gain over last year. RIRCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.92 vs. FSBCX (7.99).
| FSBCX | RIRCX | FSBCX / RIRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.91 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.91 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.090 | 11.301 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 130B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.38 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.15 | 11.48 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.33 | 46.69 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.99 | 39.92 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.49 | 66.47 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers