Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBCX vs RIRFX
FSBCX vs RIRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSBCX vs RIRFX
FSBCX vs RIRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBCX vs. RIRFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBCX is a Buy and RIRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRFX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. FSBCX (293M). RIRFX pays higher dividends than FSBCX: RIRFX (2.97) vs FSBCX (1.35). FSBCX was incepted earlier than RIRFX: FSBCX (33 years) vs RIRFX (24 years). FSBCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RIRFX (0.30). FSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RIRFX (50.00). RIRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSBCX: RIRFX (250) vs FSBCX (1500). FSBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.16 vs. RIRFX (12.89). RIRFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. FSBCX (5.82).
| FSBCX | RIRFX | FSBCX / RIRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.30 | 650% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.30 | 730% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.287 | 7.284 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 127B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 2.97 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.16 | 12.89 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.32 | 42.79 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.82 | 41.40 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.67 | 83.92 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers