Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBCX vs RIRFX
FSBCX vs RIRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSBCX vs RIRFX
FSBCX vs RIRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBCX vs. RIRFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBCX is a StrongBuy and RIRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRFX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FSBCX (285M). RIRFX pays higher dividends than FSBCX: RIRFX (2.91) vs FSBCX (1.25). FSBCX was incepted earlier than RIRFX: FSBCX (33 years) vs RIRFX (24 years). FSBCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RIRFX (0.30). FSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RIRFX (50.00). RIRFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSBCX: RIRFX (250) vs FSBCX (1500). RIRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. FSBCX (6.89). RIRFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.64 vs. FSBCX (5.46).
| FSBCX | RIRFX | FSBCX / RIRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.30 | 650% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.30 | 730% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.953 | 9.848 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 2.91 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.89 | 7.90 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.58 | 45.58 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.46 | 44.64 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.58 | 88.38 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers