Ad is loading...
FSBDX vs GFACX
FSBDX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs GFACX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth
Price$16.33
Change-$1.25 (-7.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.03B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
FSBDX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. FSBDX (11B). FSBDX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FSBDX (0.74) vs GFACX (0.00). FSBDX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FSBDX (11 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.01). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FSBDX (0) vs GFACX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.42 vs. GFACX (-1.75). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. FSBDX (48.46).
| FSBDX | GFACX | FSBDX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.391 | -5.003 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 280B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.42 | -1.75 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.42 | 0.63 | 3,393% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.46 | 59.73 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.84 | 44.46 | 94% |