Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs GFACX
FSBDX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs GFACX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth
Price$19.53
Change-$0.28 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.17B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
FSBDX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. FSBDX (13.2B). FSBDX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FSBDX (0.67) vs GFACX (0.00). FSBDX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FSBDX (12 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.01). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FSBDX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. FSBDX (0.97). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. FSBDX (19.59).
| FSBDX | GFACX | FSBDX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.36 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.151 | 4.705 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 310B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.97 | 5.17 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.03 | 46.73 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.59 | 39.11 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.74 | 55.69 | 104% |