Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs GFACX
FSBDX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs GFACX
FSBDX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FSBDX (17.7B). FSBDX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FSBDX (0.34) vs GFACX (0.00). FSBDX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FSBDX (13 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.00). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FSBDX (0) vs GFACX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.64 vs. GFACX (-2.39). FSBDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.91 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| FSBDX | GFACX | FSBDX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.35 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.35 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.210 | 8.529 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.7B | 353B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | -2.39 | -779% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.66 | 34.46 | 263% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.91 | 3.85 | 1,659% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.85 | 82.33 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers