Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs RGAGX
FSBDX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs RGAGX
FSBDX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Hold and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FSBDX (16.4B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FSBDX: RGAGX (0.52) vs FSBDX (0.35). FSBDX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FSBDX (13 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). RGAGX (0.29) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.00). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FSBDX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.73 vs. RGAGX (5.99). FSBDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.23 vs. RGAGX (19.07).
| FSBDX | RGAGX | FSBDX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.405 | 9.656 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.4B | 342B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.52 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.73 | 5.99 | 396% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.63 | 49.02 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.23 | 19.07 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.57 | 105.26 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers