Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs RGAGX
FSBDX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs RGAGX
FSBDX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FSBDX (16.4B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FSBDX: RGAGX (0.52) vs FSBDX (0.35). FSBDX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FSBDX (13 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). RGAGX (0.29) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.00). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FSBDX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.17 vs. RGAGX (1.96). FSBDX return over 5 years is better than : 36.42 vs. RGAGX (15.08).
| FSBDX | RGAGX | FSBDX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.923 | 5.796 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.4B | 357B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.52 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.17 | 1.96 | 980% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.05 | 37.42 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 15.08 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.69 | 103.10 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers