Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs RGAGX
FSBDX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs RGAGX
FSBDX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FSBDX (17.7B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FSBDX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FSBDX (0.34). FSBDX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FSBDX (13 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). RGAGX (0.29) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.00). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FSBDX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.64 vs. RGAGX (0.49). FSBDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.91 vs. RGAGX (15.00).
| FSBDX | RGAGX | FSBDX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.210 | 9.321 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.7B | 353B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.51 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | 0.49 | 3,811% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.66 | 44.65 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.91 | 15.00 | 426% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.85 | 110.30 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers