Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs RGAHX
FSBDX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs RGAHX
FSBDX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FSBDX (17.7B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FSBDX: RGAHX (0.40) vs FSBDX (0.34). FSBDX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FSBDX (13 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RGAHX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.00). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FSBDX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.64 vs. RGAHX (0.18). FSBDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.91 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| FSBDX | RGAHX | FSBDX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.210 | 9.200 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.7B | 353B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.40 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | 0.18 | 10,382% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.66 | 43.47 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.91 | 13.78 | 464% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.85 | 106.68 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement