Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs RGEBX
FSBDX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs RGEBX
FSBDX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FSBDX (17.7B). FSBDX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FSBDX (0.34) vs RGEBX (0.00). FSBDX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FSBDX (13 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.00). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FSBDX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.64 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). FSBDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.91 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| FSBDX | RGEBX | FSBDX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.210 | 8.727 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.7B | 353B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | -0.77 | -2,409% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.66 | 39.77 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.91 | 9.71 | 658% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.85 | 97.58 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement