Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBKX vs RIRFX
FSBKX vs RIRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSBKX vs RIRFX
FSBKX vs RIRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBKX vs. RIRFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBKX is a Buy and RIRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRFX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. FSBKX (293M). RIRFX pays higher dividends than FSBKX: RIRFX (2.97) vs FSBKX (1.61). FSBKX was incepted earlier than RIRFX: FSBKX (23 years) vs RIRFX (24 years). FSBKX (1.85) is less costly to investors than RIRFX (0.30). FSBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RIRFX (50.00). FSBKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIRFX: FSBKX (0) vs RIRFX (250). FSBKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. RIRFX (12.89). RIRFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. FSBKX (8.14).
| FSBKX | RIRFX | FSBKX / RIRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.30 | 527% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.30 | 617% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.443 | 7.284 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 127B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 2.97 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 12.89 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.90 | 42.79 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.14 | 41.40 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.86 | 83.92 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement