Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBLX vs FWCBX
FSBLX vs FWCBX Comparison
Open Charts FSBLX vs FWCBX
FSBLX vs FWCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWCBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FSBLX (289M). FWCBX pays higher dividends than FSBLX: FWCBX (2.97) vs FSBLX (2.26). FSBLX was incepted earlier than FWCBX: FSBLX (10 years) vs FWCBX (6 years). FSBLX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FWCBX (0.31). FSBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FWCBX (50.00). FSBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWCBX: FSBLX (0) vs FWCBX (250). FSBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.46 vs. FWCBX (12.18). FWCBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.08 vs. FSBLX (12.95).
| FSBLX | FWCBX | FSBLX / FWCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.31 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.31 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.045 | 7.411 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 2.97 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.46 | 12.18 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.61 | 42.50 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.95 | 42.08 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers