Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCAX vs UBVVX
FSCAX vs UBVVX Comparison
Open Charts FSCAX vs UBVVX
FSCAX vs UBVVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCAX vs. UBVVX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCAX is a Hold and UBVVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBVVX has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. FSCAX (286M). UBVVX pays higher dividends than FSCAX: UBVVX (1.59) vs FSCAX (0.73). FSCAX was incepted earlier than UBVVX: FSCAX (32 years) vs UBVVX (9 years). FSCAX (1.30) is less costly to investors than UBVVX (0.94). UBVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSCAX (21.00). UBVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCAX: UBVVX (0) vs FSCAX (3000). FSCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.73 vs. UBVVX (9.60). FSCAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.13 vs. UBVVX (18.82).
| FSCAX | UBVVX | FSCAX / UBVVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.94 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.744 | 14.187 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 9.02B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.59 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.73 | 9.60 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.96 | 14.27 | 287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.13 | 18.82 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement