Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCCX vs UBVVX
FSCCX vs UBVVX Comparison
Open Charts FSCCX vs UBVVX
FSCCX vs UBVVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCCX vs. UBVVX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCCX is a Buy and UBVVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBVVX has more cash in the bank: 9.04B vs. FSCCX (288M). UBVVX pays higher dividends than FSCCX: UBVVX (1.61) vs FSCCX (0.92). FSCCX was incepted earlier than UBVVX: FSCCX (32 years) vs UBVVX (9 years). FSCCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than UBVVX (0.94). UBVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSCCX (21.00). UBVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCCX: UBVVX (0) vs FSCCX (100000). FSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.45 vs. UBVVX (5.69). FSCCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.76 vs. UBVVX (18.47).
| FSCCX | UBVVX | FSCCX / UBVVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.90 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.407 | 13.279 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288M | 9.04B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.61 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.45 | 5.69 | 342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.60 | 20.16 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.76 | 18.47 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement