Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCCX vs VSIAX
FSCCX vs VSIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSCCX vs VSIAX
FSCCX vs VSIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCCX vs. VSIAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCCX is a Hold and VSIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSIAX has more cash in the bank: 68.2B vs. FSCCX (281M). VSIAX pays higher dividends than FSCCX: VSIAX (1.75) vs FSCCX (0.94). FSCCX was incepted earlier than VSIAX: FSCCX (32 years) vs VSIAX (15 years). FSCCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than VSIAX (0.07). VSIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FSCCX (21.00). VSIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSCCX: VSIAX (3000) vs FSCCX (100000). VSIAX (13.62) and FSCCX (13.19) have marching annual gain over last year. FSCCX (45.66) and VSIAX (44.40) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSCCX | VSIAX | FSCCX / VSIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.07 | 1,357% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.07 | 1,500% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.207 | 13.663 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 3000 | 3,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 68.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.19 | 13.62 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.58 | 48.36 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.66 | 44.40 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.04 | 132.86 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers