Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs FSSNX
FSCDX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs FSSNX
FSCDX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. FSSNX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. FSCDX (2.4B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than FSCDX: FSSNX (1.06) vs FSCDX (0.02). FSCDX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: FSCDX (28 years) vs FSSNX (15 years). FSCDX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSCDX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. FSCDX (29.30). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. FSCDX (11.98).
| FSCDX | FSSNX | FSCDX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,800% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.212 | 18.919 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 34.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.06 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.30 | 34.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.11 | 53.64 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.98 | 38.13 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.70 | 146.34 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers