Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs FSSNX
FSCDX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs FSSNX
FSCDX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. FSSNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.5B vs. FSCDX (2.37B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than FSCDX: FSSNX (1.05) vs FSCDX (0.02). FSCDX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: FSCDX (28 years) vs FSSNX (15 years). FSCDX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FSCDX (34.00). FSCDX (0) and FSSNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. FSCDX (16.62). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.23 vs. FSCDX (5.91).
| FSCDX | FSSNX | FSCDX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.03 | 4,800% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.396 | 17.495 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 34.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.05 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.62 | 20.98 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.42 | 62.87 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.91 | 36.23 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.76 | 140.89 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement