Ad is loading...
FSCDX vs FTHFX
FSCDX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs FTHFX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$24.06
Change-$1.72 (-6.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.55
Change-$2.65 (-6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.94B
FSCDX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. FTHFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.94B vs. FSCDX (1.82B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: FSCDX (1.67) vs FTHFX (0.82). FSCDX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: FSCDX (27 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX (41.00) and FSCDX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: FSCDX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.00 vs. FSCDX (-13.65). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 134.22 vs. FSCDX (61.61).
| FSCDX | FTHFX | FSCDX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.63 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.63 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.835 | -6.275 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 9.94B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.82 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.65 | -6.00 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.02 | 23.74 | -46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.61 | 134.22 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.42 | 90.21 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...