Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs FTHFX
FSCDX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs FTHFX
FSCDX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. FTHFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FSCDX (2.4B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than FSCDX: FTHFX (0.56) vs FSCDX (0.02). FSCDX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: FSCDX (28 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FSCDX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: FSCDX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FSCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.45 vs. FTHFX (24.72). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. FSCDX (13.09).
| FSCDX | FTHFX | FSCDX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.64 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.64 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.474 | 18.613 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 12.1B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.56 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.45 | 24.72 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.86 | 64.64 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.09 | 67.28 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.17 | 241.65 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement