Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs FTHFX
FSCDX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs FTHFX
FSCDX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. FTHFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FSCDX (2.49B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than FSCDX: FTHFX (0.57) vs FSCDX (0.02). FSCDX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: FSCDX (28 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FSCDX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: FSCDX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FSCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.78 vs. FTHFX (25.56). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. FSCDX (16.68).
| FSCDX | FTHFX | FSCDX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.64 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.64 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.440 | 15.175 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.49B | 12.1B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.57 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.78 | 25.56 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.72 | 55.30 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.68 | 65.58 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.93 | 231.04 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement