Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$28.04
Change-$0.04 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.17
Change-$0.19 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. FSCDX (1.94B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCDX (1.52) vs NAESX (1.25). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.34 vs. FSCDX (-2.92). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 54.62 vs. FSCDX (22.06).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.332 | 0.337 | 693% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 154B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.25 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.92 | 12.34 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.39 | 22.72 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.06 | 54.62 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.08 | 107.61 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement