Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$29.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.46
Change+$0.30 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. FSCDX (1.94B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCDX (1.52) vs NAESX (1.25). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. FSCDX (-5.52). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 60.61 vs. FSCDX (27.48).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.799 | 5.381 | 145% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 154B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.25 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.52 | 9.99 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.97 | 32.16 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.48 | 60.61 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.32 | 130.39 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement