Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$26.78
Change+$0.35 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$111.61
Change+$1.26 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FSCDX (1.83B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCDX (1.63) vs NAESX (1.35). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. FSCDX (-9.91). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.20 vs. FSCDX (20.24).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.681 | -4.086 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 148B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.35 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.91 | 5.13 | -193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.55 | 16.63 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.24 | 52.20 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.00 | 96.08 | -6% |