Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$29.51
Change-$0.31 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.49
Change-$1.24 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSCDX (2.02B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCDX (1.44) vs NAESX (1.23). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.42 vs. FSCDX (-5.61). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 58.94 vs. FSCDX (25.64).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.673 | 7.684 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 162B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.23 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.61 | 10.42 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.92 | 48.54 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.64 | 58.94 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.59 | 133.72 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement