Ad is loading...
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$24.70
Change+$0.60 (+2.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$103.13
Change+$2.17 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FSCDX (1.82B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCDX (1.67) vs NAESX (1.39). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.36 vs. FSCDX (-14.94). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.57 vs. FSCDX (33.87).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.172 | -12.247 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.39 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.94 | -2.36 | 633% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.73 | 4.67 | -209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.87 | 71.57 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.23 | 78.60 | -18% |