Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap A
Price$27.60
Change+$0.39 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$113.54
Change+$1.55 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FSCDX (1.83B). FSCDX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FSCDX (1.63) vs NAESX (1.35). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (27 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSCDX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSCDX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. FSCDX (-6.41). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.49 vs. FSCDX (33.99).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.17 | 753% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.838 | -2.660 | 32% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 148B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.35 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.41 | 7.95 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.84 | 29.27 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.99 | 68.49 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.77 | 100.57 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement