Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs NAESX
FSCDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. FSCDX (2.37B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSCDX: NAESX (1.08) vs FSCDX (0.02). FSCDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCDX (28 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSCDX (1.20) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSCDX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSCDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.09 vs. NAESX (28.95). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.38 vs. FSCDX (11.72).
| FSCDX | NAESX | FSCDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.225 | 13.680 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 177B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.08 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.09 | 28.95 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.92 | 54.86 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.72 | 33.38 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.81 | 160.50 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers