Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCDX vs VRTIX
FSCDX vs VRTIX Comparison
Open Charts FSCDX vs VRTIX
FSCDX vs VRTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCDX vs. VRTIX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCDX is a Hold and VRTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTIX has more cash in the bank: 17.5B vs. FSCDX (2.4B). VRTIX pays higher dividends than FSCDX: VRTIX (1.12) vs FSCDX (0.02). FSCDX was incepted earlier than VRTIX: FSCDX (28 years) vs VRTIX (16 years). FSCDX (1.20) is less costly to investors than VRTIX (0.05). FSCDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. VRTIX (14.00). FSCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRTIX: FSCDX (0) vs VRTIX (5000000). VRTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.16 vs. FSCDX (28.45). VRTIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.82 vs. FSCDX (13.09).
| FSCDX | VRTIX | FSCDX / VRTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.05 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.05 | 2,400% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.474 | 22.079 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 17.5B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.12 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.45 | 33.16 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.86 | 65.02 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.09 | 41.82 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.17 | 152.08 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement